Compare flagships
Two assets. Two specifications.
Compare Signal Bitcoin Active and Signal Ethereum Active side by side.
Illustrative allocations
Illustrative allocations · Not a live signal
Both strategies follow the same demonstration regime.
Signal Bitcoin Active
BTC
60%
Cash
40%
Signal Ethereum Active
ETH
60%
Cash
40%
BTC
ETH
Hypothetical allocations are equal in this example.
Demonstration states only — not current or historical signals of either methodology.
Why they can diverge
Different assets, different rules.
Bitcoin and Ethereum have different market dynamics, and each index is governed by its own methodology specification. The two strategies should not be assumed to share signals or rebalancing rules — at any given time they may hold different target exposures.
Specification comparison
| Field | Signal Bitcoin Active | Signal Ethereum Active |
|---|---|---|
| Underlying asset | Bitcoin (BTC) | Ethereum (ETH) |
| Minimum / maximum exposure | 20% / 100% | 20% / 100% |
| Cash allocation mechanism | Unallocated weight held in cash, up to 80% at minimum exposure | Unallocated weight held in cash, up to 80% at minimum exposure |
| Signal methodology | Proprietary market-timing methodology developed by Eric Jackson | Documented Ethereum-specific methodology |
| Rebalancing frequency | To be published | To be published |
| Launch status | To be published | To be published |
| Historical data availability | Not yet available | Not yet available |